Avatar

Rod Dalrymple

  • Total activity 21
  • Last activity
  • Member since
  • Following 2 users
  • Followed by 3 users
  • Votes 0
  • Subscriptions 13

Activity overview

Latest activity by Rod Dalrymple
  • Avatar

    Rod Dalrymple commented,

    Pending approval

    The example JSON in the new section 'Example product data structure (subset)' applies a still-open change proposal (#614 Definition of PERCENT in BankingProductRateTierV3) by applying the RateStrin...

  • Avatar

    Rod Dalrymple commented,

    Pending approval

    Just some minor corrections: Example product data structure (subset) > ... three fixed rates with different criteria and conditionsEach bullet point similar to "... from $50K-$25MM" should use a ...

  • Avatar

    Rod Dalrymple commented,

    Thanks Jarryd, Please coordinate with Nils Berge as he advised that the suggested correction to this article ("previousDays":[0]) has been made and I raised a work request on the standards-staging ...

  • Avatar

    Rod Dalrymple commented,

    The previousDays property is an array of NaturalNumber (although the data standards show '[object]'), so the examples should use '[0]' rather than '0'. Please let me know if I should raise a change...

  • Avatar

    Rod Dalrymple commented,

    The depositRate and lendingRate objects (anonymous within the depositRates and lendingRates arrays) have a single rate with an array of tiers that qualify an account for that rate. For your example...

  • Avatar

    Rod Dalrymple commented,

    The link See: > 'CDS Standards, Payload conventions, Mandatory/Optional fields' is actually a link to the current page (with a different title). I couldn't find an article with the title in the lin...

  • Avatar

    Rod Dalrymple commented,

    Could you please correct the link for See: > CDS Schemas at the bottom of the article. The anchor has the last two characters missing. It should be: https://consumerdatastandardsaustralia.github.io...

  • Avatar

    Rod Dalrymple commented,

    Should the 'X2P01.01' in the first sentence of the answer be 'X2P1.01'? This seems to be a typo, as the correct enumeration for the 'service' field in the standards (i.e. 'X2P1.01') is used elsewhe...